Question: I received a letter from my financial adviser that said I would have to pay a higher percentage in fees because my account size fell below $250,000. The reason my account fell below $250,000 is because the adviser lost money on the investments. To charge me more seems outrageous. Do you agree?

Answer: I find it distasteful, too, because of the sharp decline in the market over the last few years. You would think a conscientious adviser would be reluctant to charge higher fees after these circumstances.

Still, some of the large brokerage firms are rigid. They charge the highest fees to clients with $250,000 or less in accounts - sometimes the fees can be 2 percent of assets or more annually. When your account goes over $500,000, fees go down, and usually at $1 million they are at the lowest levels.

Fees of 2 percent might not sound like much, but the effect, even compared with 1 percent, is huge. Over a lifetime of investing, paying an extra percentage point can reduce your nest egg by hundreds of thousands of dollars.

I would not balk at an adviser who charged about 1 percent, paid close attention to you and your account, and selected sound investments. I also would not blame an adviser if together you agreed on a portfolio that had stock mutual funds that declined 40 percent last year. The leading market benchmark dropped roughly 40 percent, so it would have been typical for …

Read the original article at Philly

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks

Related Posts

  • Borrowers over reach themselves
  • Kiwis spending $45 less every week - economist
  • Go-Ahead Group leads travel, leisure sector higher in London
  • Will house prices fall further?
  • Eurozone growth forecast uplifted
  • What were SCF bosses thinking?

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply